Ethics Commission
City and County of San Francisco

Executive Director’s Report – January 4, 2021

Date: January 4, 2021
To: Members of the Ethics Commission
From: LeeAnn Pelham, Executive Director
Subject: Agenda Item 5 – Executive Director’s Report for January 2021

Summary                   

This report provides various programmatic and operational highlights since the last Executive Director’s Report.

Action Requested 

No action is required by the Commission, as this item is for informational purposes only.

Hiring Plan Update

As I reported on December 14, 2020, job announcements for positions in recruitment were posted in mid-December. We are continuing to receive applications via the City’s main application portal for the five positions in active recruitment.

I am happy to report that two hiring decisions have now been made. Senior Information Systems Business Analyst (1053) Tyler Field will assume duties as IS Engineer (1042) effective today, January 4. At the same time, IS Business Analyst (1052) Jarrod Flores will assume duties as the new Senior Information Systems Business Analyst (1053).  These positions are critical to expanding and maintaining the Commission’s e-filing and data systems, department operations, application programming interfaces (APIs), campaign finance dashboards, and filling key personnel needed to implement the Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests program citywide. With the vacancy created in the 1052 Business Analyst previously held by Jarrod Flores, applications are already being accepted. The application period for the 1052 position is scheduled to close on January 15, 2021.

Racial Equity Action Plan Update

The Ethics Commission Racial Equity Action Plan that our office submitted to the Office of Racial Equity (ORE) by the December 31, 2020 deadline as required by Ordinance 188-19 was submitted on December 29th. The Plan is available on the Commission’s Racial Equity Plan webpage. Following the Commission’s review and endorsement of the initial draft plan at last month’s Commission meeting on December 14, the Plan submitted in December also reflects revisions made after that meeting based on feedback provided in a discussion with the Office of Racial Equity on December 22. As the Commission noted last month, we anticipate that this Plan will be a living document that continues to expand and evolve to reflect the full breadth of its commitments, experiences, aspirations, and practices as a Commission and staff team.

Status Report on Implementation of BLA Audit Recommendations

Attachment 1 provides a status report on the implementation of recommendations contained in the Budget and Legislative Analyst (BLA) August 10, 2020 Performance Report of the Ethics Commission. As noted in last month’s Executive Director report, the Board of Supervisors Government Audit and Oversight Committee discussed the audit on November 19 under Committee Agenda Item 10 (BOS File No. 201158) and filed the report without taking further action.  As detailed in our departmental response included in the audit report, our office is in full agreement with the audit recommendations. We will continue to provide the Commission with quarterly status reports as our work to implement the recommendations continues.

Budget Update and Interested Persons Meetings on the Commission Budget

Mayor’s FY22 Budget Instructions

The Mayor issued annual budget instructions to City Departments for FY22 on December 16. Those instructions cited a projected shortfall for the upcoming two-year budget of $653.2 million and the following Mayoral policy priorities for the fiscal year that begins July 1, 2021:

  • Supporting small business and economic recovery;
  • Prioritizing programs with demonstrated outcomes centered around equity;
  • Implementing homelessness and mental health programming; and
  • Continuing to respond to COVID.

The Mayor’s budget directive also included the following instructions regarding the Commission’s projected $5,123,435[1] operating budget:

  • mandatory reduction proposals of 7.5% ($372,468) in adjusted General Fund support, with an additional 2.5% ($124,156) contingency;
  • departments should prioritize core services, and present clear tradeoffs;
  • reduction proposals can include contract savings, efficiencies, new revenue sources, and reduction in personnel costs, including reduction in filled positions;
  • emphasis on racial equity in departmental proposals;
  • describe budget proposals through an equity lens; and
  • internal racial equity work should be prioritized within existing budget.

The proposed cuts are on top of the Commission’s attrition savings target of $236,091[2] which requires departments to plan for salary savings due to anticipated position vacancies.  The proposed 10% reductions in total combined with the attrition savings target could require the elimination of approximately six to seven positions, which represents roughly a quarter of the Commission’s staff.  Staff will present a budget proposal that addresses the Mayor’s instructions regarding the updated base operating budget at the February Commission meeting.  All Departmental Budget submissions are due on February 22. The Mayor’s proposal for balanced budget is expected to go to the Board of Supervisors June 1, with Budget and Finance Committee hearings beginning in June and budget consideration by the full Board in July.

Interested Persons Meetings on Budget Priorities

In December 2019, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 294-19 that amended the City’s Administrative Code to modify the process for the City’s adoption of the annual budget, in part by requiring City agencies to hold public hearings prior to submission of their proposed budgets to the Mayor.

Beginning in December 2020, following the issuance of budget instructions from the Mayor, departments are required to hold a public meeting concerning departmental budget priorities at which members of the public may provide input. The purpose of the meeting is to allow for public input into the agency’s budget for the upcoming fiscal year prior to the department finalizing a proposed budget. Ordinance Sec. 3.3(b).  For departments subject to the oversight of a commission under the Charter or Municipal Code, the commission may satisfy this requirement by holding a hearing regarding budget priorities at a regular or special meeting subject to both the Brown Act and the Sunshine Ordinance, at least 15 days prior to the commission’s final approval of the agency’s proposed budget.

In addition, by no later than February 14 each year, each agency must hold a public meeting concerning the department’s proposed budget to allow for public input prior to the agency’s submission of that proposed budget. Ordinance Sec. 3.3(c). Content required to be provided must include information about agency divisions; budget totals and major changes including new or reduced initiatives and staffing changes; changes in service levels; projected salary savings; and how the agency is meeting budget instruction targets. The Ordinance requires this public meeting to occur no less than 15 days after the public meeting to obtain input budget priorities. For agencies governed by a commission this requirement can be satisfied at a regular or special meeting at which it considers final approval of the agency’s proposed budget, which also are subject to the Brown Act and Sunshine Ordinance.

As has been the practice in recent years, Staff presents an overview of the planned budget submission for the Commission’s consideration at its February monthly meeting. Under the budget process Ordinance, a budget item on the Commission’s February meeting agenda will meet the requirement for public input of Section 3.3(c). This year the Commission’s regular monthly meeting in January will be on Friday, January 8. In February it is scheduled for Friday, February 12, requiring materials for that meeting to be publicly available no later than Tuesday, February 9. As noted above, budget submissions are due February 22.

Given this schedule, to meet the requirement in Sec. 3.3(b) for a public meeting on departmental budget priorities, that public meeting must be held no later than Wednesday, January 27, 2021.

Staff therefore plan to notice two Interested Persons meetings for the week of January 18 to discuss and elicit feedback on Commission budget priorities, with the Commission’s February 12 meeting providing the opportunity for input on a proposed budget. The purpose of holding two interested persons (“IP”) meetings is to provide opportunities for the public to engage on the Commission’s budget. At the same time, two IP sessions would enable up to two Commissioners at each session to engage directly with the public while still abiding by all appropriate Brown Act and Sunshine Ordinance considerations.

Revenues Report

The table below shows the revenues received by the Commission during the fiscal year that began on July 1, 2020, as of December 31, 2020.

Summary of FY20-21 Revenues
 FY 20-21 Budgeted AmountFY 20-21 Receipts as of December 31, 2020
Lobbyist Registration Fees$85,000$14,000
Lobbyists Fines$2,000$1,000
Campaign Consultants Fees$7,000$4,800
Contact Lobbyist and Other$2,450$0
Statement of Economic Interests Filings-Late Fees$1,250$850
Campaign Consultant Fines$2,000$0
Campaign Finance Fines (includes late fees and forfeitures)$50,000$9,800
Ethics, Other/ Administrative Fines Levied by the Commission$7,500$3,025
Major Developer Fee$0$500
Total$157,200$33,975

I look forward to answering any questions or providing further information at the upcoming Commission meeting.

[1] The $5,123,435 FY21-22 operating budget is based on projections adopted during the FY20-21 budget process.  Updated base operating budget figures to be used during the FY-21-22 budget process have yet to be released to departments.

[2] The $236,091 attrition savings target is based on projections adopted during the FY20-21 budget process.  Updated base operating budget figures to be used during the FY-21-22 budget process have yet to be released to departments.

Was this page helpful?

Scan with a QR reader to access page:
QR Code to Access Page
https://sfethics.org/ethics/2021/01/executive-directors-report-january-4-2021.html